![]() |
|
Global Score | |
31.7 | 33.7 |
Basic Information | |
Sharp | Motorola |
2010-07-19 | 2011-05-13 |
4.20 x 2.20 x 0.60 inches | 4.20 x 2.30 x 0.60 inches |
5.00 ounces | 4.00 ounces |
-- | Black |
$ 100.00 | $ 80.00 |
Display / Screen | |
3 inches | 2 inches |
240 x 400 pixels | 220 x 176 pixels |
TFT | TFT |
155 pixels per inch | 141 pixels per inch |
Yes | No touch screen |
5.9 | 5.7 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
81,92 MB internal memory | 8,19 MB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
1.82 | 0.2 |
Camera | |
2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
4.73 | 3.63 |
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | -- |
SIM | -- |
0.9 | 0 |
Battery Life | |
1240mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1130mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 100 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
2.96 | 2.8 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
GPS | GPS |
-- | FM Radio |
Digital TV Broadcast | -- |
Motorola Clutch + i475 has a score of 33.7, which is just a bit better than the Sharp FX's 31.7 general score. The Motorola Clutch + i475 is a lighter cellphone than the Sharp FX, but both are 0.6inches thick. Sharp FX and Motorola Clutch + i475 count with similar CPUs, they have 0 cpu cores. Sharp FX has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a much higher 400 x 240 pixels resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a really larger screen.
The Sharp FX features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 32 GB and more internal storage. Sharp FX counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
The Sharp FX takes a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 2 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Clutch + i475 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.