Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.1 | 23.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Siemens | Nokia |
| -- | 2002-11-04 |
| 4.33 x 1.85 x 0.91 inches | 4.27 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 3.67 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 101 x 80 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 720mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 225 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.08 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 5100 has a score of 23.2, which is just a bit better than the Siemens A60's global score of 22.1. The Nokia 5100 is a heavier but just a little thinner cellphone than Siemens A60. The Nokia 5100 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to Siemens A60's processing unit, they have the same number of cores.
Nokia 5100 has a screen that is just as good as the screen in Siemens A60, although the Nokia 5100 also has a much better 128 x 128 resolution. Nokia 5100's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Siemens A60 one. Nokia 5100's battery life is just as good as the battery life in Siemens A60, although the Nokia 5100 also has 720mAh of battery capacity instead of 700mAh.
The Nokia 5100's camera is very similar to the Siemens A60 one.
The Nokia 5100 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.