Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 22.1 | 24.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Siemens | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-03 |
| 3.98 x 1.77 x 0.79 inches | 3.43 x 1.91 x 0.93 inches |
| 2.75 ounces | 3.50 ounces |
| $ 225.00 | $ 200.00 |
| 101 x 80 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 650mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time |
| 2 | 1.36 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola C290 is slightly better than Siemens A70, with a 24.2 score against 22.1. Even being the best phone we compare here, Motorola C290's body is thicker and notably heavier than Siemens A70. The Motorola C290's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Siemens A70, they have a 0-Core processor.
The Motorola C290 has a little sharper screen than Siemens A70, because it has a way better 160 x 128 pixels resolution. The Siemens A70 and the Motorola C290 feature very similar storage to install applications and games. Siemens A70 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola C290.
The Motorola C290 counts with a camera that's very similar to the Siemens A70 one.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola C290 is also cheap compared to the Siemens A70.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.