Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.2 | 23.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Siemens | Nokia |
| -- | 2002-11-04 |
| 3.98 x 1.73 x 0.79 inches | 4.27 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches |
| 2.75 ounces | 3.67 ounces |
| $ 99.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 101 x 80 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| CSTN | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 720mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 225 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2 | 2.08 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 5100 is a little bit better than the Siemens A75, having a 23.2 score against 22.2. Nokia 5100 is a a little bit thicker and heavier phone than the Siemens A75. The Nokia 5100 and Siemens A75 count with very similar displays, although the Nokia 5100 also has a way higher resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
Nokia 5100's processor is just as good as Siemens A75's processor, both have 0 processing cores. The Nokia 5100's storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as Siemens A75's one. The Nokia 5100 and Siemens A75 feature quite similar cameras. The Nokia 5100 features a bit longer battery life than Siemens A75, because it has 720mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia 5100 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.