Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.9 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Siemens | Kyocera |
| 2005-08-12 | 2006-09-13 |
| 3.27 x 1.77 x 0.71 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 2.70 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 130 x 130 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,54 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 2.4 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Kyocera Marbl has a score of 24.5, which is just a bit better than the Siemens CF110's 22.9 overall score. Although the Kyocera Marbl is newer than Siemens CF110, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Kyocera Marbl and Siemens CF110 feature quite similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.
Kyocera Marbl features a much sharper screen than Siemens CF110, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 128 x 128px. Siemens CF110 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Kyocera Marbl. The Kyocera Marbl has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Siemens CF110. Kyocera Marbl has a very superior battery lifetime than Siemens CF110, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity instead of 600mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Kyocera Marbl is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.