Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 22.4 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Siemens | Kyocera |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| 6.06 x 2.08 x 1.14 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 6.57 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 175.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.9 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| UMTS, GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 1.3 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.4 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Kyocera Marbl has an overall score of 24.5, which is slightly better than Siemens U10's score of 22.4. Kyocera Marbl is a way thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than the Siemens U10. Kyocera Marbl has an incredibly better looking display than Siemens U10, although it has a much lower 128 x 128px resolution.
The Kyocera Marbl's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Siemens U10, both have a 0-Core processing unit. Siemens U10 and Kyocera Marbl both count with extremely similar memory capacity for games and applications, although the Kyocera Marbl has no SD card slot. The Kyocera Marbl's camera is just as good as Siemens U10's camera.
Kyocera Marbl has just a little better battery life than Siemens U10, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Kyocera Marbl is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.