Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.4 | 24.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Siemens | Nokia |
| -- | 2002-03-12 |
| 6.06 x 2.08 x 1.14 inches | 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.69 inches |
| 6.57 ounces | 2.93 ounces |
| $ 175.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.9 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| UMTS, GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 720mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 1.3 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.08 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 7210 is slightly better than Siemens U10, getting a 24.1 score against 22.4. The Nokia 7210 is a incredibly thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than the Siemens U10. Nokia 7210 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the CPU in Siemens U10, both have the same number of cores.
The Siemens U10 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 7210, because it has a way better 220 x 176 resolution. The Siemens U10 and the Nokia 7210 count with incredibly similar cameras. Nokia 7210 counts with as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Siemens U10 one, although the Nokia 7210 has no SD extension slot.
Siemens U10 has just a bit better battery life than Nokia 7210, because it has 800mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 7210 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.