Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 24 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sonim | Kyocera |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| 4.45 x 1.97 x 0.87 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 114 pixels per inch | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | -- |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Kyocera Marbl has a global score of 24.5, which is slightly better than the Sonim XP1's 24 score. The Kyocera Marbl is a incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Sonim XP1. Kyocera Marbl's processing unit is just as good as the Sonim XP1 one, both of them have 0 CPU cores. The Sonim XP1 has just a bit better looking display than Kyocera Marbl, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density and a little higher 160 x 128 resolution.
Kyocera Marbl and Sonim XP1 have really similar cameras. The Kyocera Marbl and Sonim XP1 have quite similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos. Sonim XP1 has improved battery life than Kyocera Marbl, because it has a 1100mAh battery capacity.
The Kyocera Marbl not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.