Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sonim | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.45 x 1.97 x 0.87 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| 114 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | -- |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 has a global score of 24.7, which is slightly better than Sonim XP1's score of 24. Motorola W315's design is noticeably lighter and a little bit thinner than the Sonim XP1. The Motorola W315 and Sonim XP1 count with incredibly similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores.
The Sonim XP1 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola W315. They have an equal resolution of 160 x 128. Motorola W315's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Sonim XP1's one. Motorola W315's camera is just as good as Sonim XP1's camera. The Sonim XP1 features improved battery performance than Motorola W315, because it has a 1100mAh battery capacity instead of 850mAh.
The Motorola W315 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.