Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sonim | Nokia |
| 2010-12-10 | 2004-11-02 |
| 4.96 x 2.36 x 0.98 inches | 4.17 x 1.73 x 0.79 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 235.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | -- |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 3,58 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.76 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 800 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | 330 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 3.6 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6020 is a bit better than the Sonim XP1300 CORE, getting a 27.7 score against 25.4. Nokia 6020's construction is thinner and extremely lighter than the Sonim XP1300 CORE, although it was released 6 years before. Sonim XP1300 CORE counts with a lot better screen than Nokia 6020, because it has a lot higher 320 x 240 resolution.
Sonim XP1300 CORE counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 6020, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 8 GB. The Nokia 6020 and Sonim XP1300 CORE count with really similar processing units, they have 0 cores. Nokia 6020 counts with a much better camera than Sonim XP1300 CORE.
The Sonim XP1300 CORE features a superior battery life than Nokia 6020, because it has a 130% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Nokia 6020 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.