Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.7 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sonim | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.69 x 2.20 x 0.94 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 250.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| 85 pixels per inch | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 has a score of 26, which is just a bit better than Sonim XP3 Enduro's general score of 23.7. The Nokia 1600 is a way lighter and much thinner cellphone than the Sonim XP3 Enduro. The Sonim XP3 Enduro features a slightly better looking display than Nokia 1600, because it has a lot higher 160 x 128 pixels resolution and a greater screen density.
The Nokia 1600's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Sonim XP3 Enduro's one. Nokia 1600 and Sonim XP3 Enduro feature really similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores. Sonim XP3 Enduro features better battery performance than Nokia 1600, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity.
Sonim XP3 Enduro and Nokia 1600 have very similar cameras.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia 1600 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.