Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 31.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sonim | Samsung |
| -- | 2008-09-02 |
| 4.69 x 2.20 x 0.98 inches | 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 2.70 ounces |
| $ 519.00 | $ 150.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 68 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.73 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1500 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | 4.4 hours talk time |
| 3.76 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung SPH-M320 has a score of 31.4, which is a bit better than Sonim XP3 Quest's overall score of 28.6. Samsung SPH-M320's design is incredibly lighter and extremely thinner than the Sonim XP3 Quest. The Samsung SPH-M320's processing unit is just as good as Sonim XP3 Quest's CPU, both of them have 0 processing cores.
Sonim XP3 Quest counts with a lot better display than Samsung SPH-M320. They have the same exact resolution of 160 x 128px. Sonim XP3 Quest has a lot better camera than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution. The Samsung SPH-M320 has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Sonim XP3 Quest, although the Samsung SPH-M320 has no SD extension slot.
Sonim XP3 Quest has a much longer battery duration than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has 1850mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung SPH-M320 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.