Global Score | |
36.8 | 40.3 |
Basic Information | |
Sony | Samsung |
2008-02-10 | 2009-02-16 |
4.17 x 1.89 x 0.61 inches | 4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches |
3.70 ounces | 3.88 ounces |
$ 169.00 | $ 125.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2.2 inches | 2.6 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
TFT | TFT |
182 pixels per inch | 179 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | No touch screen |
6.1 | 6.4 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
148,48 MB internal memory | 92,16 MB internal memory |
Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
0.7 | 0.6 |
Camera | |
3.20 MP | 5.00 MP |
-- | 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution |
5.17 | 6.05 |
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.9 | 0.9 |
Battery Life | |
950mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 880mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
300 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
2.48 | 2.4 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
GPS | GPS |
-- | Accelerometer |
The Samsung Ultra S has a score of 40.3, which is just a bit better than Sony Ericsson C702's 36.8 general score. Samsung Ultra S's design is newer and somewhat thinner than Sony Ericsson C702's, but it is also just a little heavier. The Samsung Ultra S has a bit sharper screen than Sony Ericsson C702, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 400 x 240px and a bigger display.
Samsung Ultra S has a processor that is very similar to Sony Ericsson C702's processing unit, both have the same number of cores. Samsung Ultra S captures better pictures and videos than Sony Ericsson C702, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP. The Sony Ericsson C702 has a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Ultra S, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 56,32 MB more internal memory capacity.
The Sony Ericsson C702 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Ultra S, because it has a 950mAh battery capacity instead of 880mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Ultra S is also by far the cheapest.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.