Compare phones
Sharp FX
STX-2
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 29.6 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Sharp |
| Symbian 7.0 | -- |
| -- | 2010-07-19 |
| 4.53 x 2.24 x 0.94 inches | 4.20 x 2.20 x 0.60 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| $ 245.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 3 inches |
| 208 x 320 pixels | 240 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 155 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Yes |
| 3.1 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 65,54 MB internal memory | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| Memory Stick Duo external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.5 | 1.82 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | -- |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1240mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Digital TV Broadcast |
Comparison review
The Sharp FX is just a bit better than Sony Ericsson P910, with a global score of 31.7 against 29.6. Sharp FX's body is a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Sony Ericsson P910. Sharp FX's processor is very similar to the processor in Sony Ericsson P910, although the Sharp FX has a lower number of MHz cores.
The Sharp FX counts with a lot better looking display than Sony Ericsson P910, because it has a higher 400 x 240 resolution. The Sharp FX counts with a much better camera than Sony Ericsson P910, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels. Sharp FX has a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Sony Ericsson P910, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Sharp FX counts with longer battery duration than Sony Ericsson P910, because it has a 1240mAh battery capacity.
The Sharp FX is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.