Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 3.62 x 1.61 x 0.77 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 2.14 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 570mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 180 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.84 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 has a general score of 26, which is a bit better than the Sony Ericsson T600's 24.5 score. Nokia 1600's design is thinner but way heavier than the Sony Ericsson T600. The Nokia 1600 has a much more vibrant display than Sony Ericsson T600. The Nokia 1600 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Sony Ericsson T600 one, both have the same number of cores.
Nokia 1600 and Sony Ericsson T600 both have very similar storage to store more apps and games. The Nokia 1600 counts with a much better battery life than Sony Ericsson T600, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity instead of 570mAh. Sony Ericsson T600 and Nokia 1600 both count with similar cameras.
The Nokia 1600 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.