Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.142.3
Basic Information
SonyHTC
--Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2006-02-282009-06-25
3.50 x 1.80 x 1.00 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
3.30 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
102 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.36
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory--
Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.32.9
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Polymer Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
9.5 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.43.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

HTC Ozone has a general score of 42.3, which is a lot better than the Sony Ericsson W300's 32.1 overall score. Although HTC Ozone is heavier than Sony Ericsson W300, it's notably thinner and also notably newer. The HTC Ozone has a sharper display than Sony Ericsson W300, because it has a lot higher 240 x 320 resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen.

Sony Ericsson W300 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than HTC Ozone, although it has no external memory card slot. The HTC Ozone has a quite superior hardware performance than Sony Ericsson W300, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster). HTC Ozone captures much better pictures and videos than Sony Ericsson W300, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera.

HTC Ozone has a superior battery lifetime than Sony Ericsson W300, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.

HTC Ozone costs the same than Sony Ericsson W300, which makes it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.