Global Score | |
36.9 | 40.4 |
Basic Information | |
Sony | Samsung |
2008-07-22 | 2011-01-18 |
3.94 x 1.85 x 0.55 inches | 4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches |
3.67 ounces | 3.32 ounces |
$ 335.00 | $ 79.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2.2 inches | 3 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
TFT | TFT |
182 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | Capacitive |
6.1 | 5.9 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
40,96 MB internal memory | -- |
Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
0.4 | 1 |
Camera | |
3.20 MP | 3.20 MP |
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
5.39 | 5.39 |
Networks | |
-- | Wi-Fi |
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.9 | 2.7 |
Battery Life | |
950mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
385 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | 900 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time |
2.48 | 2.56 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
The Samsung Star II is a bit better than Sony Ericsson W595, getting a global score of 40.4 against 36.9. The Samsung Star II is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Sony Ericsson W595. The Sony Ericsson W595 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Star II, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 320 x 240 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel count in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Star II features a much better storage to install applications and games than Sony Ericsson W595. Sony Ericsson W595 and Samsung Star II both have extremely similar processing units, they have the same number of cores. The Samsung Star II features just a bit better battery lifetime than Sony Ericsson W595, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Star II's camera is very similar to the camera in Sony Ericsson W595, both of them have a back facing camera with a 3.2 mega pixels, the same 15 fps video frame rates and the same (QVGA) video quality.
The Samsung Star II not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.