Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
33.736.1
Basic Information
SonySamsung
--0000-00-00
3.60 x 1.80 x 0.90 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
4.20 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 89.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
157 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.96.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
Storage
262,14 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.80
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
1.362.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Samsung Chrono is a little bit better than the Sony Ericsson W600, getting a 36.1 score against 33.7. Samsung Chrono is a noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Sony Ericsson W600. Samsung Chrono counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Sony Ericsson W600, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an extra GPU.

Samsung Chrono counts with a bit sharper display than Sony Ericsson W600, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen. Sony Ericsson W600 features a much better camera than Samsung Chrono, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back.

Sony Ericsson W600 has a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Chrono. Samsung Chrono counts with a way better battery life than Sony Ericsson W600.

Samsung Chrono not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Sony Ericsson W600.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.