Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.8 | 33.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| 2006-03-18 | 2011-06-21 |
| 3.40 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches |
| 3.60 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| $ 115.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.6 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| -- | 154 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 3.1 | 5.8 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 32 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.73 | 4.73 |
| EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 350 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 400 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia C2-03 has a global score of 33.4, which is a little bit better than Sony Ericsson W710's general score of 30.8. Although the Nokia C2-03 is somewhat heavier than the Sony Ericsson W710, it's notably thinner and also noticeably newer. The Nokia C2-03 features a much better display than Sony Ericsson W710, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240.
The Nokia C2-03 has a processor that's very similar to the Sony Ericsson W710 one, both have 0 cpu cores. Nokia C2-03 has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Ericsson W710. Both have equal internal storage capacity. The Nokia C2-03 has greater battery duration than Sony Ericsson W710, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
The Nokia C2-03 and Sony Ericsson W710 have quite similar cameras, both of them have a 2 mega-pixels camera in the back.
Nokia C2-03 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.