Global Score | |
36.9 | 40.4 |
Basic Information | |
Sony | Samsung |
2007-11-06 | 2011-01-18 |
4.10 x 1.83 x 0.38 inches | 4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches |
2.75 ounces | 3.32 ounces |
$ 99.00 | $ 79.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2 inches | 3 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
TFT | TFT |
200 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | Capacitive |
6.3 | 5.9 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
28,67 MB internal memory | -- |
Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
0.3 | 1 |
Camera | |
3.20 MP | 3.20 MP |
-- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
5.06 | 5.39 |
Networks | |
-- | Wi-Fi |
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.9 | 2.7 |
Battery Life | |
950mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
360 hours standby time 9.5 hours talk time | 900 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time |
2.48 | 2.56 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
-- | Accelerometer |
The Samsung Star II has an overall score of 40.4, which is a little bit better than Sony Ericsson W890's 36.9 score. The Samsung Star II is a incredibly newer cellphone than the Sony Ericsson W890, although it is extremely thicker and heavier. Sony Ericsson W890 and Samsung Star II feature very similar CPUs, they have a 0-Core processing unit.
The Sony Ericsson W890 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Star II, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 320 x 240px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density. The Samsung Star II shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Sony Ericsson W890. Both have the same resolution back camera.
The Samsung Star II counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Sony Ericsson W890. Samsung Star II features just a bit longer battery duration than Sony Ericsson W890, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Star II is also by far the cheapest.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.