Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.334.4
Basic Information
SonyMotorola
2005-10-172006-07-25
4.30 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches4.05 x 1.65 x 0.62 inches
5.20 ounces3.60 ounces
$ 249.00$ 199.00
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
--128 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.15.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
481,28 MB internal memory12,29 MB internal memory
Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Duo external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
1.10.2
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.844.73
UMTS, GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Polymer Battery700mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
370 hours standby time
8.2 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
6.5 hours talk time
2.42.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 1.2
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

The Motorola KRZR K1 is just a bit better than the Sony Ericsson W900, having a overall score of 34.4 against 31.3. The Motorola KRZR K1 design is newer, notably lighter and noticeably thinner than the Sony Ericsson W900. The Sony Ericsson W900 and the Motorola KRZR K1 feature incredibly similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.

The Motorola KRZR K1 counts with a way better looking screen than Sony Ericsson W900, although it has a lot lower resolution of 220 x 176 pixels. Sony Ericsson W900 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola KRZR K1, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.

Sony Ericsson W900 has greater battery duration than Motorola KRZR K1, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity instead of 700mAh. The Sony Ericsson W900 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola KRZR K1. They have a 2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola KRZR K1 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.