Global Score | |
31.3 | 34.1 |
Basic Information | |
Sony | Nokia |
2005-10-17 | 2009-05-18 |
4.30 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches | 4.31 x 1.85 x 0.57 inches |
5.20 ounces | 3.09 ounces |
$ 249.00 | $ 199.00 |
Display / Screen | |
-- | 2 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFT |
-- | 200 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | No touch screen |
3.1 | 6.3 |
processor | processor |
-- | 32 MB RAM |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
481,28 MB internal memory | 30,72 MB internal memory |
Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Duo external memory slot | microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slot |
1.1 | 0.84 |
Camera | |
2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
4.84 | 4.73 |
UMTS, GPRS and GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.2 | 0.4 |
Battery Life | |
900mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
370 hours standby time 8.2 hours talk time | 396 hours standby time 7.4 hours talk time |
2.4 | 2.64 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
Infra-red port | -- |
The Nokia 2730 classic US has a general score of 34.1, which is a bit better than the Sony Ericsson W900's 31.3 general score. The Nokia 2730 classic US is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and a lot lighter than the Sony Ericsson W900. Sony Ericsson W900 and Nokia 2730 classic US both have incredibly similar processing units, they have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 2730 classic US has a lot better looking screen than Sony Ericsson W900. Both of them have an equal 320 x 240 pixels resolution. The Sony Ericsson W900 takes a bit better videos and photos than Nokia 2730 classic US. They have a same resolution camera. Sony Ericsson W900 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 2730 classic US, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 450,56 MB more internal storage capacity.
The Nokia 2730 classic US has greater battery life than Sony Ericsson W900, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Nokia 2730 classic US is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.