Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.442.3
Basic Information
SonyHTC
Symbian 9.1Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2006-02-132009-06-25
4.10 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
4.00 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
3.16
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
Storage
4 GB internal memory--
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
2.50
Camera
--2.00 MP
04.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
UMTS, GPRS and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.22.9
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Polymer Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
340 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.43.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

HTC Ozone is a lot better than Sony Ericsson W950, getting a 42.3 score against 28.4. The HTC Ozone has Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 operating system, and Sony Ericsson W950 comes with Symbian 9.1 operating system. The HTC Ozone is a way newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Sony Ericsson W950.

HTC Ozone has a way better looking display than Sony Ericsson W950. Both have the same exact 240 x 320 pixels resolution. The Sony Ericsson W950 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Ozone, although it has no external SD slot. HTC Ozone has a superior processing power than Sony Ericsson W950, because it has more cpu cores.

HTC Ozone counts with a superior battery lifetime than Sony Ericsson W950, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity. The HTC Ozone features a way better camera than Sony Ericsson W950.

HTC Ozone and the Sony Ericsson W950 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.