Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.0, 2.3 | Android 10 |
| 2011-06-22 | 2020-05-05 |
| 3.62 x 2.17 x 0.65 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 3.91 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 192 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 327,68 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.22 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.61 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 351 hours standby time 4.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way better than Sony Ericsson Xperia Active, with an 81.1 score against 50.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Active. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the newer 10 version while Sony Ericsson Xperia Active has Android 4.0.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a brighter display than Sony Ericsson Xperia Active, because it has a much higher pixels density, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better hardware performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Active, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than Sony Ericsson Xperia Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Sony Ericsson Xperia Active, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 1200mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better camera than Sony Ericsson Xperia Active, because it has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.