Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 2.3.4, 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-02-13 | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.57 x 2.24 x 0.51 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.10 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 430 hours standby time 6.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, having an 81.9 score against 55.1. The Google Pixel 4 design is newer and extremely thinner than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's, but it is way heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a way better 1080 x 2280 resolution, a way bigger screen and a way higher pixel number per inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4 features a much better hardware performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a very superior camera than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a much larger camera aperture, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot higher 12.2 MP resolution back camera. The Google Pixel 4 has a much better battery performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.