Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.4, 2.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-02-13 | 2020-04-29 |
| 4.57 x 2.24 x 0.51 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.10 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 430 hours standby time 6.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's 55.1 general score. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo has Android 2.3.4 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is much newer and notably thinner than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's, but it is notably heavier.
Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior processing unit than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has much more pixels per inch of screen, a lot bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A51 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light images, a back camera with way more MP and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 127 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a really longer battery duration than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.