Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 2.3.4, 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-02-13 | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.57 x 2.24 x 0.51 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.10 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 430 hours standby time 6.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's score of 55.1. Although Google Pixel 4 is way heavier than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, it's incredibly thinner and also much newer. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit sharper display than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a much higher pixel density, a much larger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. Google Pixel 4 has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a very superior camera than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution, a way bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and a lot better (4K) video quality. The Google Pixel 4 has a very superior battery performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has an 87 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.