Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.4, 2.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-02-13 | 2020-04-29 |
| 4.57 x 2.24 x 0.51 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.10 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 430 hours standby time 6.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's 55.1 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo has Android 2.3.4. Galaxy A51 5G's body is way newer and thinner than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's, although it is incredibly heavier.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much faster processing unit than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more vivid display than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a lot larger display and a much higher pixels number per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way better camera than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a much better (4K) video definition, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a 200 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.