Compare phones
Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo
MT15iSamsung Galaxy S3 Slim
SM-G3812B| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.4, 2.3 | Android 4.2 |
| 2011-02-13 | 2014-03-15 |
| 4.57 x 2.24 x 0.51 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 350.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 265 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | -- |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 512 MB (500 MHz) RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.56 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 8.10 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.03 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 430 hours standby time 6.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a score of 60.4, which is a little bit better than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's general score of 55.1. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim construction is newer and a lot thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has the newer 4.2 version and Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo has Android 2.3.4 version.
The Galaxy S3 Slim counts with just a little better performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S3 Slim counts with a display that's just as good as Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo's screen, because although the Galaxy S3 Slim has a little lower display density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 960 x 540 pixels and a larger screen.
The Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same (HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo also has a much more MP back facing camera. The Galaxy S3 Slim features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB, the Galaxy S3 Slim also has 7 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a really longer battery performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, because it has a 40 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.