Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 2.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-02-13 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.72 x 2.24 x 0.53 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 327,68 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.22 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.10 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 430 hours standby time 6.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is much better than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro's 49.3 overall score. These phones come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has newer 11 version while Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro has Android 2.3 version, providing the user a couple additional features. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is newer and noticeably thinner, but also heavier than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit more vivid display than Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px, a way larger screen and a much greater pixel number per screen inch. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 63,68 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a much faster processor than Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cores. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a way better battery lifetime than Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Google Pixel 3a XL captures greater pictures and videos than Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Google Pixel 3a XL is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.