Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.54 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Purple | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 643 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 II is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a general score of 91 against 80.1. The Xperia 1 II is a thinner and way lighter device than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were released only 2 months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia 1 II has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xperia 1 II counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia 1 II also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xperia 1 II has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a larger display and a better resolution of 1644 x 3840.
The Sony Xperia 1 II captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the Sony Xperia 1 II also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Xperia 1 II counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better battery performance than Sony Xperia 1 II, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.