Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-07-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Purple | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 III has an overall score of 93.3, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. The Xperia 1 III body is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is thicker and heavier. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia 1 III has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Sony Xperia 1 III counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Sony Xperia 1 III counts with a little bit better display than Moto Z Force, because it has a quite greater count of pixels per inch of screen, a larger screen and a better 1644 x 3840 resolution.
Xperia 1 III features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xperia 1 III features a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images.
The Sony Xperia 1 III has better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia 1 III is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.