Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Purple and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 948.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 643 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Although the Xperia 1 is older than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's design is lighter and extremely thinner. Xperia 1 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a higher 1644 x 3840 resolution and a larger screen.
The Sony Xperia 1 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Sony Xperia 1 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Sony Xperia 1 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality pictures and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Sony Xperia 1 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Xperia 1 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB, the Xperia 1 also has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with improved battery duration than Sony Xperia 1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xperia 1 is also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.