Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia 10 III is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 83.7 score against 80.1. The Sony Xperia 10 III is a newer cellphone, and it is also noticeably lighter and extremely thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Sony Xperia 10 III has the older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid screen than Xperia 10 III, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per display inch and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Sony Xperia 10 III counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster CPU than Xperia 10 III, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Sony Xperia 10 III counts with a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Sony Xperia 10 III also counts with a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Sony Xperia 10 III feature similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.