Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a bit better than Xperia 10 III's overall score of 83.7. Galaxy Z Flip's design is thinner than the Xperia 10 III, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released about a year before. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Xperia 10 III has Android 11, so it gives some extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a display that is very similar to Sony Xperia 10 III's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia 10 III, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than Sony Xperia 10 III, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has higher video frame rate and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xperia 10 III has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Sony Xperia 10 III counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.