Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than the Xperia 10 III's general score of 83.7. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xperia 10 III were released with only 9 months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is somewhat thinner but also much heavier. These devices include the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user very similar operating system features.
The Xperia 10 III has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, it also counts with a little better number of pixels in each screen inch. The Xperia 10 III counts with a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better processing unit than Sony Xperia 10 III, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia 10 III, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Xperia 10 III and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both have incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.