Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.87 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 430.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 422 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia 10 Plus's general score of 75.4. Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than the Sony Xperia 10 Plus, it's notably heavier and thicker. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster processing unit than Xperia 10 Plus. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better screen than Xperia 10 Plus, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher screen density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Xperia 10 Plus's one, they have an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and equal internal memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia 10 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Sony Xperia 10 Plus takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have a camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the Sony Xperia 10 Plus also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia 10 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Sony Xperia 10 Plus. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Sony Xperia 10 Plus, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.