Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snpadragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,46 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Sony Xperia 10 VI, with a score of 98.9 against 73.2. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Sony Xperia 10 VI has Android 14 version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better performing CPU than Sony Xperia 10 VI, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better display than Sony Xperia 10 VI, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a quite bigger display and a just a bit better screen pixels density. Xperia 10 VI has just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Xperia 10 VI also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,46 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Xperia 10 VI, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera. Xperia 10 VI has a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.