Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| 2019-02-27 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.68 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is much better than the Xperia 10, having an 84.2 score against 73.7. Even though the iPhone XS and the Xperia 10 were released only 5 months apart, iPhone XS's body is just a little thinner but a little heavier than the Xperia 10. IPhone XS counts with a little bit better looking display than Sony Xperia 10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little better pixels density.
IPhone XS counts with a superior hardware performance than Sony Xperia 10, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM. The Xperia 10 features a much better storage for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xperia 10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Xperia 10 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 2870mAh battery size. IPhone XS captures much better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia 10, because although it has a lower video resolution and a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a larger back camera sensor.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xperia 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia 10. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xperia 10, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.