Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.14 x 2.68 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than the Xperia 10, with an 82.5 score against 73.7. LG V30S ThinQ is an older phone than the Xperia 10, but it is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter anyway. LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Xperia 10, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a quite greater screen density.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ shoots much better photographs and videos than Xperia 10, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light photos.
LG V30S ThinQ has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia 10, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Xperia 10, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xperia 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia 10. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xperia 10, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.