Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.68 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Xperia 10's general score of 73.7. The Galaxy Fold design is somewhat thinner but notably heavier than Xperia 10, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Galaxy Fold has just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia 10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xperia 10 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count in each display inch. Galaxy Fold has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia 10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold captures way better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia 10, because although it has a lower video quality and a back facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a much larger aperture. The Galaxy Fold features a very superior battery life than Xperia 10, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Sony Xperia 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Sony Xperia 10. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Sony Xperia 10, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.