Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.68 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than Xperia 10's 73.7 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is heavier than the Xperia 10, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Xperia 10 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Xperia 10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia 10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way better camera than Xperia 10, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a worse video definition, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way better battery duration than Xperia 10, because it has a 57% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Sony Xperia 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Sony Xperia 10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Sony Xperia 10, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.