Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 848.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 II is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 87.2 score against 78.9. The Xperia 5 II construction is newer, a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Google Pixel 3a XL. Sony Xperia 5 II has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia 5 II also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xperia 5 II counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little higher pixels density, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Xperia 5 II features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xperia 5 II has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity. The Xperia 5 II captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xperia 5 II, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.