Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-12 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 II has an overall score of 87.2, which is much better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Xperia 5 II design has the same weight than the Moto Z Force, but it's a bit thicker. Xperia 5 II features a bit faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto Z Force has a little sharper screen than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xperia 5 II captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
Sony Xperia 5 II has just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Xperia 5 II features a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.