Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-12 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 848.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia 5 II has a global score of 87.2, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. The Sony Xperia 5 II is a newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster processor than Sony Xperia 5 II, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia 5 II features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a bit higher display density. The Xperia 5 II counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery lifetime than Xperia 5 II, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior camera than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way better video resolution.
Xperia 5 II is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.