Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-12 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia 5 II is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having an 87.2 score against 79.9. Despite of the fact that Sony Xperia 5 II is extremely older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is a little bit thinner and lighter. Sony Xperia 5 II has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia 5 II also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a tinier aperture, a way tinier sensor capturing way lower quality videos and pictures and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with better battery life than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.