Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2020-10-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia 5 II's score of 87.2. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy A52 construction is a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Sony Xperia 5 II. Xperia 5 II counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia 5 II also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density and a little higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A52 has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 takes better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.