Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-12 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 449 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Sony Xperia 5 II, getting an 88.1 score against 87.2. Although it's the best in this review, we must highlight that it is also noticeably heavier and thicker. The Xperia 5 II and the Samsung Galaxy F62 have quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a just a bit worse pixels count in each inch in the display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy F62 captures better photos and videos than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low-light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.