Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 848.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Xperia 5 II's score of 87.2. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Xperia 5 II, it must be noted that it is also much heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia 5 II, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a quite bigger display and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit faster CPU than Sony Xperia 5 II, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Xperia 5 II one, they have an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and equal internal storage.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes way better videos and photos than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has longer battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than the Sony Xperia 5 II, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.