Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-12 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 848.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than Xperia 5 II, having a 90.7 score against 87.2. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is way lighter and way thinner than Xperia 5 II. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Xperia 5 II, because it has a just a bit better pixel quantity per inch in the display, a little bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Xperia 5 II counts with a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Xperia 5 II counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery duration than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.